Get all the data you need about the real estate market in the French Alps
SUMMARY
We analyzed residential property rental yields in the French Alps, as of 2026, for residential property buyers, using the raw dataset provided and building it into a practical yield guide for foreign individual buyers.
The article compares year-round Alpine cities and lake towns such as Grenoble, Annecy, Aix-les-Bains, and Briançon with ski-resort and four-season tourism markets such as Chamonix, Megève, Morzine, Tignes, Val d’Isère, Courchevel, La Plagne, Les Arcs, and Val Thorens.
The tracker is updated regularly, so the numbers should be read as a May 2026 snapshot of residential property rental yields in the French Alps rather than as a fixed long-term forecast.
The strongest beginner yield market in the dataset is Grenoble. A typical 1-bedroom apartment is estimated at €145,000, with €720 monthly rent, 6.0% gross yield, and 4.6% net yield.
Among ski-resort markets, Val Thorens / Les Belleville, La Plagne / Les Arcs, Tignes, and Morzine / Les Gets look stronger for rental income than prestige resorts because purchase prices are lower relative to achievable rent.
The weakest yield profiles are usually in Courchevel, Val d’Isère, and Megève. These are excellent ownership and lifestyle markets, but high purchase prices absorb much of the rental income.
The best risk-adjusted property size in the French Alps is usually a 2-bedroom apartment. It is large enough for families, ski groups, remote workers, and local tenants, but not as expensive or operationally heavy as a large chalet.
Large chalets can earn impressive rent, especially in luxury resorts, but the dataset treats them cautiously because management, heating, repairs, snow clearance, utilities, linen, caretaker costs, and vacancy can remove 40% or more of revenue.
Older ski apartments require special caution. DPE risk, high copropriété charges, dated layouts, poor lift access, and future renovation costs can turn a strong gross yield into a much weaker net result.
For a beginner foreign buyer, the practical takeaway is simple: compare net yield, property condition, altitude, access, rental rules, building costs, tenant depth, and resale liquidity together before buying a rental property in the French Alps.
Get fresh and reliable information about the market in the French Alps
Don't base significant investment decisions on outdated data. Get updated and accurate information.
Residential property rental yields in the French Alps in 2026
This table compares residential property rental yields in the French Alps by area and bedroom count.
For each neighborhood or resort area, the table shows estimated average purchase price, estimated average monthly rent, gross rental yield, and net rental yield for 1-bedroom, 2-bedroom, and 3-bedroom residential properties.
For resort markets, the monthly rent should be read as annual achievable rent divided by 12, because ski apartments and chalets often earn income seasonally. Finally, please note you'll find much more detailed data in our real estate pack about the French Alps.
| Neighborhood | 1-bedroom property average purchase price | 1-bedroom property average monthly rent | 1-bedroom property gross rental yield | 1-bedroom property net rental yield | 2-bedroom property average purchase price | 2-bedroom property average monthly rent | 2-bedroom property gross rental yield | 2-bedroom property net rental yield | 3-bedroom property average purchase price | 3-bedroom property average monthly rent | 3-bedroom property gross rental yield | 3-bedroom property net rental yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aix-les-Bains | €205,000 | €830 | 4.9% | 3.7% | €330,000 | €1,180 | 4.3% | 3.2% | €485,000 | €1,520 | 3.8% | 2.8% |
| Annecy | €310,000 | €1,150 | 4.5% | 3.4% | €520,000 | €1,680 | 3.9% | 2.9% | €760,000 | €2,150 | 3.4% | 2.5% |
| Briançon / Serre Chevalier | €155,000 | €720 | 5.6% | 3.9% | €265,000 | €1,110 | 5.0% | 3.5% | €430,000 | €1,680 | 4.7% | 3.1% |
| Chamonix-Mont-Blanc | €390,000 | €1,520 | 4.7% | 3.0% | €690,000 | €2,560 | 4.5% | 2.8% | €1,150,000 | €4,200 | 4.4% | 2.5% |
| Courchevel | €670,000 | €2,000 | 3.6% | 2.1% | €1,250,000 | €4,050 | 3.9% | 2.2% | €2,150,000 | €7,100 | 4.0% | 2.1% |
| Grenoble | €145,000 | €720 | 6.0% | 4.6% | €230,000 | €980 | 5.1% | 3.9% | €330,000 | €1,250 | 4.5% | 3.3% |
| La Clusaz / Le Grand-Bornand | €355,000 | €1,280 | 4.3% | 2.8% | €620,000 | €2,250 | 4.4% | 2.8% | €980,000 | €3,650 | 4.5% | 2.6% |
| La Plagne / Les Arcs | €240,000 | €1,020 | 5.1% | 3.4% | €410,000 | €1,820 | 5.3% | 3.5% | €650,000 | €2,850 | 5.3% | 3.2% |
| L’Alpe d’Huez | €250,000 | €1,050 | 5.0% | 3.3% | €430,000 | €1,850 | 5.2% | 3.4% | €690,000 | €2,900 | 5.0% | 3.0% |
| Megève | €520,000 | €1,500 | 3.5% | 2.2% | €930,000 | €2,750 | 3.5% | 2.1% | €1,650,000 | €5,200 | 3.8% | 2.0% |
| Morzine / Les Gets | €310,000 | €1,270 | 4.9% | 3.2% | €540,000 | €2,250 | 5.0% | 3.3% | €870,000 | €3,600 | 5.0% | 2.9% |
| Tignes | €330,000 | €1,350 | 4.9% | 3.2% | €570,000 | €2,420 | 5.1% | 3.3% | €900,000 | €3,850 | 5.1% | 3.0% |
| Val d’Isère | €620,000 | €1,760 | 3.4% | 2.1% | €1,100,000 | €3,500 | 3.8% | 2.2% | €1,900,000 | €6,400 | 4.0% | 2.1% |
| Val Thorens / Les Belleville | €270,000 | €1,230 | 5.5% | 3.6% | €470,000 | €2,150 | 5.5% | 3.6% | €760,000 | €3,300 | 5.2% | 3.1% |
Make a profitable investment in the French Alps
Better information leads to better decisions. Save time and money. Download our data.
Which neighborhoods offer the best net yield among areas people actually want to live in the French Alps?
The best net-yield neighborhoods among areas people actually want to live in the French Alps are Grenoble, Val Thorens / Les Belleville, La Plagne / Les Arcs, Morzine / Les Gets, and Tignes.
These areas combine above-average net rental yield with real tenant or tourist demand, rather than relying only on cheap purchase prices.
Grenoble is the clearest long-term rental yield market in the dataset. A typical 1-bedroom apartment is modeled at €145,000 with €720 per month, producing 6.0% gross yield and 4.6% net yield.
Val Thorens / Les Belleville is the strongest resort-yield case. A 2-bedroom property is modeled at €470,000 with effective monthly rent of €2,150, giving 5.5% gross yield and 3.6% net yield.
La Plagne / Les Arcs also looks attractive because a 2-bedroom property is modeled at €410,000 with €1,820 effective monthly rent and 3.5% net yield. That is a better income profile than Chamonix, where the 2-bedroom net yield is 2.8%.
Morzine / Les Gets and Tignes sit in the middle. They are not cheap, but their 2-bedroom net yields of 3.3% show a better balance between rent and purchase price than luxury resorts such as Courchevel, Megève, and Val d’Isère.
Where can I find residential properties with above-average yields and below-average entry prices in the French Alps?
The best above-average yield and below-average entry-price areas in the French Alps are Grenoble, Briançon / Serre Chevalier, La Plagne / Les Arcs, L’Alpe d’Huez, and Val Thorens / Les Belleville.
These areas offer lower entry prices than Chamonix, Megève, Courchevel, or Val d’Isère while still having identifiable rental demand.
Grenoble is the purest value case. A modeled 1-bedroom costs €145,000, far below Annecy’s €310,000 and Chamonix’s €390,000, while still producing a stronger 4.6% net yield.
Briançon / Serre Chevalier is the lower-cost mountain option. A 2-bedroom is modeled at €265,000 with €1,110 effective monthly rent and 3.5% net yield.
La Plagne / Les Arcs is a strong value resort because the modeled 2-bedroom price is €410,000, compared with €690,000 in Chamonix and €1.1 million in Val d’Isère. Yet the 2-bedroom net yield is 3.5%, above Chamonix’s 2.8% and Val d’Isère’s 2.2%.
The practical warning is that cheap ski stock can hide renovation risk. A low-priced apartment with poor DPE, high service charges, or weak summer appeal can look attractive on gross yield but disappoint after real costs.
Where does the rent level justify the purchase price most clearly in the French Alps?
The rent level most clearly justifies the purchase price in Grenoble, Val Thorens / Les Belleville, La Plagne / Les Arcs, Tignes, and Morzine / Les Gets.
These French Alps areas show the strongest relationship between annual rent and purchase price in the table.
Grenoble is the simplest case. A 1-bedroom apartment has a modeled rent-to-price ratio of 6.0% gross and 4.6% net, supported by local residents, students, workers, hospitals, research, and university demand.
Val Thorens / Les Belleville is the strongest high-altitude resort case. A 1-bedroom is modeled at €270,000 with €1,230 effective monthly rent, creating 5.5% gross yield and 3.6% net yield.
Tignes also looks rational for rental income. A 2-bedroom is modeled at €570,000 with €2,420 effective monthly rent, producing 5.1% gross yield and 3.3% net yield.
Morzine / Les Gets has a different logic. Its 2-bedroom net yield of 3.3% is supported by winter ski weeks, summer biking and hiking, Geneva-access demand, and family holidays.
We have actually built the our real estate pack about the French Alps to make sure you won’t buy in the wrong area. Check it out.
Get to know the market before buying a property in the French Alps
Better information leads to better decisions. Get all the data you need before investing a large amount of money.
Where is the best place to buy if I want stable rental income rather than maximum yield in the French Alps?
The best French Alps locations for stable rental income are Annecy, Grenoble, Aix-les-Bains, Chamonix, and Morzine / Les Gets.
These areas are not always the highest-yielding markets, but they have deeper year-round or multi-season tenant pools.
Annecy is the most defensive market in the table. A 2-bedroom has a modeled 2.9% net yield, which is lower than Grenoble or Val Thorens, but Annecy benefits from lake appeal, employment access, family demand, and strong resale liquidity.
Grenoble gives the best combination of stability and yield. A 2-bedroom is modeled at €230,000 with €980 monthly rent and 3.9% net yield.
Aix-les-Bains is a quieter long-term income market. A 1-bedroom has a modeled 3.7% net yield, supported by lake, spa, retiree, worker, and commuter demand.
Chamonix and Morzine / Les Gets are stable for a different reason. They combine international recognition, access from Geneva, winter demand, and summer tourism, although Chamonix’s purchase prices reduce its net yield.
What type of residential property should a beginner investor buy to maximize rental profitability in the French Alps?
A beginner investor in the French Alps should usually buy a 2-bedroom apartment, not a large chalet.
The 2-bedroom format offers the best balance between purchase price, rent, tenant depth, maintenance burden, and resale liquidity.
In the table, 2-bedroom properties often have the strongest middle-ground economics. Grenoble shows 3.9% net yield, Val Thorens / Les Belleville 3.6%, La Plagne / Les Arcs 3.5%, L’Alpe d’Huez 3.4%, and Morzine / Les Gets 3.3%.
A 1-bedroom can produce a high percentage yield, especially in Grenoble and Val Thorens, but it may have higher turnover and less flexibility for families, ski groups, and remote workers.
A 3-bedroom property can earn high absolute rent. For example, a 3-bedroom in Chamonix is modeled at €4,200 effective monthly rent and a 3-bedroom in Val d’Isère at €6,400.
The problem is that larger properties cost much more and carry heavier maintenance, heating, management, and vacancy risk. That is why their net yields often fall below the 2-bedroom alternative.
We give you more details in the our real estate pack about the French Alps.
Which neighborhoods offer strong rental income with the lowest vacancy risk in the French Alps?
The French Alps neighborhoods that offer strong rental income with lower vacancy risk are Grenoble, Annecy, Aix-les-Bains, Chamonix, Morzine / Les Gets, and Val Thorens / Les Belleville.
They have either year-round tenant demand or enough seasonal depth to reduce the risk of long empty periods.
Grenoble has the strongest long-term vacancy profile because its demand is not limited to tourism. A modeled 1-bedroom earns €720 per month and 4.6% net yield, supported by ordinary residential demand.
Annecy has lower yield but strong rental depth. A 1-bedroom earns a modeled €1,150 per month with 3.4% net yield, while the lake premium supports both tenant demand and resale.
Chamonix has strong international demand and short-break appeal. Its modeled 2-bedroom rent is €2,560 effective monthly rent, although the net yield is reduced to 2.8% by high purchase prices and operating costs.
Val Thorens is less year-round than Chamonix, but its altitude supports winter rental confidence. For a rental investor, that snow-security story matters because the most valuable weeks depend on reliable ski demand.
Buying real estate in the French Alps can be risky
An increasing number of foreign investors are showing interest. However, 90% of them will make mistakes. Avoid the pitfalls with our comprehensive guide.
Which areas look overpriced relative to their rental income in the French Alps?
The areas that look most overpriced relative to rental income in the French Alps are Courchevel, Val d’Isère, Megève, and parts of Chamonix and Annecy.
They are excellent places to own, but their purchase prices are high compared with the rent they generate.
Courchevel is the clearest example. A 2-bedroom is modeled at €1,250,000 with €4,050 effective monthly rent, giving 3.9% gross yield and only 2.2% net yield.
Val d’Isère is similar. A 2-bedroom costs about €1,100,000 and rents for €3,500 effective monthly rent, which produces 3.8% gross yield and 2.2% net yield.
Megève behaves more like a wealth-preservation market than a yield market. A modeled 2-bedroom costs €930,000, earns €2,750 effective monthly rent, and produces only 2.1% net yield.
The practical interpretation is not that these are bad areas. It is that rental income alone rarely justifies the purchase price, because buyers are also paying for prestige, scarcity, village character, services, and lifestyle appeal.
Which neighborhoods should I avoid even if the rental yield looks attractive in the French Alps?
A beginner should be cautious with older low-priced ski apartments in La Plagne / Les Arcs, L’Alpe d’Huez, Briançon / Serre Chevalier, and secondary pockets around lower-altitude resorts even when the headline yield looks attractive.
The issue is that the apparent yield may hide DPE risk, renovation costs, weak resale liquidity, dated layouts, high building charges, or seasonal vacancy.
La Plagne / Les Arcs can be a good rental market, with a modeled 3.5% net yield for 2-bedroom properties. But a cheap unit in an older block can underperform if the layout is weak, lift access is poor, or copropriété works are coming.
L’Alpe d’Huez also looks attractive on paper, with a 2-bedroom net yield of 3.4%. The investor risk is buying a dated or poorly located apartment that loses pricing power during peak ski weeks.
Briançon / Serre Chevalier has good affordability, with a 2-bedroom modeled at €265,000 and 3.5% net yield. The trade-off is thinner resale liquidity than Haute-Savoie resorts such as Chamonix or Morzine / Les Gets.
The honest rule is to avoid properties where the yield depends only on a low purchase price. The property still needs to be rentable, maintainable, compliant, and easy enough to resell.
Which neighborhoods look risky even though the rental yield is high in the French Alps?
The high-yield but higher-risk French Alps markets are Briançon / Serre Chevalier, L’Alpe d’Huez, La Plagne / Les Arcs, and some lower-cost buildings in Val Thorens / Les Belleville.
Their yields can be attractive, but the risk-adjusted return depends heavily on property selection.
Briançon / Serre Chevalier has good affordability and a modeled 3.9% net yield for 1-bedroom properties. The risk is not only rent, but also resale depth and whether the property sits in the strongest rental corridor.
L’Alpe d’Huez has modeled net yields of 3.3% to 3.4% for 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom properties. But older stock, building charges, and seasonal dependence can reduce actual income.
La Plagne / Les Arcs has strong scale and a modeled 3.5% net yield for 2-bedroom properties. The risk is stock quality, because large purpose-built resorts often include older apartments where DPE, layout, and future works matter a lot.
Val Thorens / Les Belleville looks strong because of altitude and 3.6% net yield for both 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom properties. A buyer still needs to check service charges, rental-management terms, heating costs, and whether the unit layout matches family demand.
Don't lose money on your property in the French Alps
100% of people who have lost money there have spent less than 1 hour researching the market. We have reviewed everything there is to know. Grab our guide now.
What neighborhoods should I avoid when buying a rental property in the French Alps?
A beginner should avoid weak micro-locations, not necessarily entire famous resorts, when buying a rental property in the French Alps.
The main avoid list is poorly located older blocks in La Plagne / Les Arcs, dated stock in L’Alpe d’Huez, peripheral Briançon / Serre Chevalier properties, overpriced Courchevel units bought only for rent, and low-quality Chamonix or Megève stock with high renovation risk.
In La Plagne / Les Arcs, avoid units where the yield depends on a low purchase price but the building has high charges, weak energy performance, or dated layouts.
In L’Alpe d’Huez, avoid properties far from lifts or village services unless the price is clearly discounted. A ski apartment that is inconvenient for skiers loses pricing power during the most valuable weeks.
In Briançon / Serre Chevalier, avoid properties with weak access to rental demand hubs. The modeled yields are good, but beginners need liquidity and reliable demand as much as a headline yield.
In Courchevel, avoid buying purely for rental yield. A 2-bedroom net yield of 2.2% and a 3-bedroom net yield of 2.1% make the income case secondary to lifestyle and capital preservation.
In Chamonix and Megève, avoid older high-priced stock with weak DPE, high service charges, or major renovation risk. These properties can be hard for a remote foreign buyer to manage profitably.
Which neighborhoods are seeing rental demand weaken, and why, in the French Alps?
The areas most exposed to weakening rental demand are lower-altitude, older, ski-dependent micro-markets, especially where rents rely on winter weeks but the property has little summer appeal.
In the table, this risk is most relevant to parts of L’Alpe d’Huez, Briançon / Serre Chevalier, and older stock in La Plagne / Les Arcs.
This is not a simple low-rent problem. The issue is that climate risk, energy rules, and renter preferences are changing what counts as a good Alpine rental.
Demand can also weaken when new or renovated stock competes with old apartments. A dated unit with a poor DPE, small rooms, no parking, and high charges can take longer to rent even in a famous resort.
The weakness is mostly a selection risk, not a collapse risk. A good property in the right building can still rent well, even in a market that looks mixed at neighborhood level.
For a beginner buyer, the practical recommendation is to demand a larger discount for older low-altitude ski stock, especially when the property has limited summer demand and visible renovation needs.
Which neighborhoods are seeing new developments that could create stronger rental demand in the French Alps?
The areas most likely to benefit from development-led rental demand are Courchevel, Val d’Isère, La Plagne / Les Arcs, Briançon / Serre Chevalier, and Val Thorens / Les Belleville.
The main reason is the French Alps 2030 Winter Olympics and the broader resort upgrading, visibility, and infrastructure attention that can come with it.
The Olympic effect is not uniform. Courchevel and Val d’Isère benefit most from prestige and event visibility, but their entry prices are already very high.
Briançon / Serre Chevalier could benefit more from improved visibility because its entry prices are much lower. A 2-bedroom is modeled at €265,000, compared with €1.1 million in Val d’Isère and €1.25 million in Courchevel.
La Plagne / Les Arcs and Val Thorens already have large rental markets. Infrastructure attention may support demand, but new supply can also make older units harder to rent.
The practical rule is to buy where new infrastructure expands the tenant pool, not where new apartments simply increase competition against older stock.
Thinking of buying real estate in the French Alps?
Acquiring property in a different country is a complex task. Don't fall into common traps – grab our guide and make better decisions.
Which neighborhoods are becoming more attractive to renters because of recent infrastructure or transport changes in the French Alps?
The French Alps neighborhoods becoming more attractive because of access and infrastructure are Morzine / Les Gets, Chamonix, La Clusaz / Le Grand-Bornand, Annecy, and Aix-les-Bains.
Their rental appeal is helped by access to Geneva, Lyon, lake economies, and multi-season use.
Chamonix benefits from international recognition and Geneva-access demand. A 2-bedroom has a modeled €690,000 price and €2,560 effective monthly rent, although the net yield is only 2.8% because the purchase price is high.
Morzine / Les Gets also benefits from Geneva access and summer activity. Its modeled 2-bedroom net yield is 3.3%, above Chamonix and Megève, while still offering a recognizable international rental market.
La Clusaz / Le Grand-Bornand is accessible and attractive, but yields are more compressed. A 2-bedroom shows 2.8% net yield because purchase prices are already high relative to rent.
Annecy and Aix-les-Bains are not ski resorts in the same way. Their access appeal is lifestyle, work, lake access, and regional commuting, which supports long-term tenants rather than only holiday renters.
Which neighborhoods have become less attractive for property investors over the last 12 months in the French Alps?
The French Alps areas that have become less attractive for yield-focused investors are Courchevel, Megève, Val d’Isère, and parts of Annecy and Chamonix.
They remain desirable, but purchase prices have moved faster than rental-income logic.
Megève is a good example. The table models a 2-bedroom at €930,000 with €2,750 effective monthly rent and only 2.1% net yield.
Val d’Isère has strong snow reliability and prestige, but the entry price is high. A modeled 2-bedroom costs €1.1 million and produces 2.2% net yield.
Annecy has also become harder for yield buyers. A 3-bedroom is modeled at €760,000 with only 2.5% net yield, because lake-market prices are high relative to residential rents.
Chamonix remains attractive, but the modeled 2-bedroom net yield of 2.8% shows how much of the rent is absorbed by high purchase prices and resort operating costs.
The trade-off is quality versus yield. These areas are still excellent places to own, but less attractive if the buyer’s main goal is rental income.
Which property types are becoming harder to rent in the French Alps, and in which neighborhoods?
The property types becoming harder to rent in the French Alps are older energy-inefficient ski apartments, oversized expensive chalets, and poorly located small units in seasonal resorts.
The problem is most visible in older stock in La Plagne / Les Arcs, L’Alpe d’Huez, Briançon / Serre Chevalier, and some dated buildings in Chamonix or Megève.
Energy-inefficient apartments are the clearest risk because rental rules and tenant expectations are becoming stricter. Older ski blocks can need insulation, window replacement, heating upgrades, or building-level renovation works.
Large chalets are also harder for beginners because the tenant pool is narrower. A 3-bedroom in Val d’Isère can generate €6,400 effective monthly rent, but the modeled net yield is only 2.1% because the purchase price and operating costs are so high.
Small ski units can also be risky if they are dated, poorly located, or dependent on one winter season. Renters now compare them with renovated apartments, hotels, and professionally managed rentals.
The best beginner property type remains the well-located 2-bedroom apartment. It can serve couples, families, friends, workers, and remote renters, while remaining easier to resell than niche chalets or awkward small units.
Get the full checklist for your due diligence in the French Alps
Don't repeat the same mistakes others have made before you. Make sure everything is in order before signing your sales contract.
Which bedroom count offers the best balance between entry price, rental yield, and tenant demand in the French Alps?
The best bedroom count for a beginner investor in the French Alps is usually the 2-bedroom property.
It gives the best balance between entry price, rental yield, tenant depth, operating complexity, and resale liquidity.
The 1-bedroom has the lowest entry price and can produce strong yields. Grenoble’s modeled 1-bedroom net yield is 4.6%, Briançon / Serre Chevalier is 3.9%, and Val Thorens / Les Belleville is 3.6%.
The 2-bedroom is more versatile. It reaches 3.9% net in Grenoble, 3.6% in Val Thorens / Les Belleville, 3.5% in La Plagne / Les Arcs, 3.4% in L’Alpe d’Huez, and 3.3% in Morzine / Les Gets and Tignes.
The 3-bedroom earns more absolute rent but usually has weaker percentage returns. In Megève, a 3-bedroom is modeled at €1.65 million with 2.0% net yield, while Courchevel’s 3-bedroom is modeled at €2.15 million with 2.1% net yield.
The French Alps local logic is clear. A 2-bedroom apartment is big enough for ski holidays, small families, remote-work stays, and local renters, but not so large that maintenance, vacancy, and purchase price overwhelm the yield.
For a beginner, the best rule is simple: buy the best 2-bedroom you can afford in a market with real year-round or multi-season demand.
INSIGHTS
These insights are drawn from the French Alps residential property rental yield dataset, with a focus on what a foreign individual buyer should understand before buying a residential property to rent out.
You’ll find even more insights in our our real estate pack about the French Alps.
- Grenoble is the strongest beginner yield market in the French Alps dataset. Its 1-bedroom net yield of 4.6% is supported by year-round local demand, not just seasonal tourism.
- Val Thorens / Les Belleville is the strongest resort-yield case because altitude and rental demand support rent better than in many prestige resorts. The 1-bedroom and 2-bedroom segments both reach 3.6% net yield.
- La Plagne / Les Arcs is a useful value resort because the 2-bedroom entry price is far below Chamonix, Val d’Isère, and Courchevel. The 3.5% net yield is attractive, but stock quality matters.
- Morzine / Les Gets offers a better yield-access balance than Chamonix. It is less prestigious, but the 2-bedroom net yield of 3.3% is stronger than Chamonix’s 2.8%.
- Tignes is a rational rental market because altitude supports winter demand. The cost burden still matters, which is why the 2-bedroom net yield settles at 3.3% rather than matching the 5.1% gross yield.
- Annecy is a stability market, not a maximum-yield market. Its lake premium compresses yields, but tenant depth and resale liquidity make it useful for cautious buyers.
- Aix-les-Bains offers steadier long-term income at a lower entry price than Annecy. It is less famous internationally, but the 1-bedroom net yield of 3.7% is practical for a beginner.
- Courchevel, Val d’Isère, and Megève are lifestyle and wealth-preservation markets first. Their high rents do not translate into strong net yield because purchase prices are so high.
- The 2-bedroom apartment is usually the best French Alps property format for income investors. It is flexible enough for families and seasonal renters without creating chalet-level costs.
- Large chalets can look impressive because monthly rent is high, but net yield is often weak. Heating, repairs, linen, management, utilities, snow, and caretaker costs can remove much of the income.
- Gross yield is especially dangerous in ski resorts. A property can show a 5% gross yield and still fall near 3% net yield after vacancy, agency fees, building charges, and maintenance.
- DPE risk is a real investment issue in older Alpine stock. A cheap apartment can become expensive if the buyer later needs insulation, heating, window, or building-level renovation work.
- Altitude is becoming more important for ski-rental pricing power. High-altitude markets such as Val Thorens and Tignes have a clearer snow-security story than lower, more seasonal locations.
- Access also matters. Chamonix, Morzine / Les Gets, La Clusaz, Annecy, and Aix-les-Bains benefit from transport, Geneva or Lyon access, and multi-season demand.
- The weakest investment is often not a weak neighborhood, but a weak building. Poor lift access, high charges, old facilities, bad layout, and poor energy performance can damage returns in an otherwise famous resort.
- For foreign buyers, the safest strategy is to buy tenant depth, not just a pretty view. Net yield, property condition, local rules, operating costs, and resale liquidity should all support the purchase.
Don't sign a document you don't understand in the French Alps
Buying a property over there? We have reviewed all the documents you need to know. Stay out of trouble - grab our comprehensive guide.
OUR METHODOLOGY TO BUILD THIS TRACKER
To estimate purchase price, monthly rent, and rental yield in different French Alps areas, we built this dataset ourselves from the ground up. We did not reuse a third-party yield dataset. We manually researched current residential sale and rental listings, then organized the data by neighborhood, resort area, and property type.
For each area and property type, we collected comparable sale listings from recognized French property platforms such as SeLoger, Bien’ici, and Logic-Immo. We used the property categories shown in the tracker, then compared only listings that were reasonably similar in location, size, condition, building type, and property format.
We cleaned the sale sample manually. Duplicate listings, unrealistic asking prices, luxury outliers, distressed assets, serviced-style offers, incomplete listings, and clearly non-comparable properties were removed before calculating the estimates.
Sale prices were normalized in euros, and on a price-per-square-meter basis where possible. We used the median price as the main reference where the sample was broad enough, or the average only when the sample was clean and not distorted by outliers.
We then built the rental side of the dataset separately. For the same area and property type, we manually collected rental listings, removed outliers and non-comparable listings, and estimated a realistic monthly rent using the median rent where possible.
For ski-resort markets, rental income is often seasonal. In those cases, we estimated annual achievable rent and converted it into an effective monthly rent so that city apartments, ski apartments, and chalets could be compared in one table.
The gross rental yield was calculated as: Gross rental yield = annual rent / estimated purchase price.
To estimate net yield, we avoided applying a flat discount across all French Alps property segments. The deduction was adjusted by neighborhood and property type, reflecting differences in building charges, vacancy risk, maintenance, management costs, agency fees, tax friction, repairs, utilities, heating, service charges, snow-related costs, garden costs, and other operating costs when relevant.
This matters because a small Grenoble apartment, a serviced-style resort flat, a ski apartment in an older copropriété, and a larger chalet do not have the same cost structure. The tracker gives more weight to net yield because it is closer to the real income a foreign individual buyer can expect after recurring costs.
For residential property markets, we also paid attention to property-level factors when available. These include building condition, age, DPE risk, access to lifts or transport, layout, parking, maintenance burden, rental restrictions, tenant depth, seasonal appeal, and resale liquidity.
Each estimate was assigned a confidence level. 30 to 40 comparable listings means higher confidence. 20 to 30 comparable listings means usable but less robust. Below 20 comparable listings means directional only, unless we widened the comparable area.
These estimates are updated regularly and should be read as structured market estimates, not as guarantees of future rental income. Honesty, quality, and rigor are at the core of our work, and they are also what you will find in our real estate pack about the French Alps.
Fact-checked and reviewed by our local expert
Laurence Rapp 🇬🇧
Sales representative at Skiing Property
